🔗 Share this article

Transpired he was able to withstand defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, undermining the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

A Tactical Conflict Over Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Football Order: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.