🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.